Introduction
A programme specification is a concise description of the intended learning outcomes from a tertiary institution programme and of the means by which these outcomes are achieved and demonstrated. A programme, in this context, is a defined curriculum path that leads to a named award.
The information required in a programme specification encourages the teaching staff to identify and express clearly and concisely:
The minimum expectation is that the information contained in programme specifications will be used to inform intending students and their advisors, students who are already studying and potential employers, about the learning outcomes from a programme and the means by which these outcomes will be achieved.
There is no single template for programme specifications but every programme specification should include certain elements as indicated below. These elements provide a starting point for deciding how best to present a programme specification.
A. Programme Description
Institution
This section requires the name, the respective department and address of the teaching institution, together with the name and address of the body or institution that bestows the award.
The award
The title of the award, the programme title, related courses, and accreditation details are included in this section. In addition, the requirements for entry into the programme, the major learning pathways within the programme such as majors and other areas of emphasis, and the targeted professional occupations for graduates are stated in this section.
B. Aims, Outcomes, Teaching/Learning Strategies, and Assessment
Programme Philosophy
The programme philosophy is a statement of the institution’s perspective of student learning, assessment, the structure of learning spaces and student support.
Programme Aims
Aims are brief and clear overall impression of the educational purposes of the programme. The aims can be stated as follows:
The main aims of a programme in … are to…
Learning Outcomes
Outcomes are more detailed statements of what the student would have gained as a result of learning. These are the knowledge, understanding, skills, capabilities and values that a student would have gained after completing the programme as a whole. Note that the programme outcomes do not reflect an aggregation of the outcomes of the courses or modules of the programme. Programme outcomes can be categorised as knowledge and understanding, intellectual/cognitive skills, and other key skills.
Here are a few stems that could be used to formulate programme outcomes:
The programme develops….
The most important values which inform this programme are….
The most important intellectual skills developed in this programme are….
The most useful practical skills, techniques and capabilities developed are….
On completing this programme we want students to know and understand….
On completing this programme we want students to be able to….
Teaching and Learning Strategies and Modalities
These are the opportunities provided by the institution for each individual student to achieve the range of learning outcomes. It is expected that the different strategies, modalities and combinations thereof, align with the learning outcomes described above.
Assessment Methods
These are the ways by which students can demonstrate that they have achieved the learning outcomes. Assessment strategies should align with the learning outcomes.
Programme Alignment
The programme should be aligned with other programmes within the same field of study within the institution.
C. Programme Structures
Programme Structures and Requirements
In this section the programme structures and features, curriculum units (modules), credit and award requirements are listed. This could include but is not limited to the following components:
Criteria for Admission to the Programme
Essential pre-requisites and registration requirements
Information about Assessment Regulations
Details of rules governing marking, i.e. second marking, examinations, pass marks, supplemental examinations, appeals, late work, disciplinary matters, and grading criteria.
D. Quality Elements
Indicators of Quality
Results of programme and institutional reviews
Accreditation status
Ratings
Peer review reports
Methods for evaluating and improving the quality and standards of learning
Student surveys, evaluation of student feedback, periodic programme and curriculum reviews, staff appraisals, mentoring schemes, peer teaching observations, external examiners’ reports, programme and subject committees’ meetings, alumni surveys.
Support for Learning
List the infrastructure and facilities that support students’ learning, such as, library, computing services, career centre, disabilities services, induction programmes, course handbook, Web sites, study skills sessions, individual guidance arrangements, tutorials, access to academic staff and counsellors, access to tutors, students’ representation on programme committees, feedback policy, professional development unit.
Date at which the programme specification was written or revised
Indicate the date
In order for a programme to be approved by the National Accreditation Council-Guyana, an institution must provide narrative and evidence to meet the following criteria.
CRITERION 1 | AUTHORISATION TO OFFER PROGRAMME |
---|---|
Criterion Statement 1.0 | Authorization to offer the programme has been given by Governing body or relevant authority. |
Standard 1.1 | Authorization from the Governing Body or relevant authority to offer the programme. |
Evidence Required |
|
CRITERION 2 | CONSISTENCY OF THE PROGRAMME WITH THE MISSION OF THE INSTITUTION |
---|---|
Evidence Required |
|
CATEGORY 3 | PROGRAMME APPROVAL |
---|---|
Criterion Statement 3.0 : | A system for internal programme approval, monitoring and review. |
Evidence Required |
|
CATEGORY 4 | PROGRAMME SPECIFICATIONS A DETAILED PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION |
---|---|
Standard 4.1: | The programme has an approved programme specification, in accordence with NAC’s programme specifications guidelines. |
Evidence Required | Please refer to included Programme Specifications guidelines |
CATEGORY 5 | RESOURCES TO SUPPORT THE PROGRAMME |
---|---|
Evidence Required |
|
CATEGORY 6 | MARKET SURVEY |
---|---|
Criterion Statement 6.0 : | A market case has been made for the offering of the programme where necessary |
Evidence Required | Report on relevant market research |
Institution | Programmes |
---|---|
Texila American University |
|
Nations Incorporated |
|
Art Williams and Harry Wendt Aeronautical Engineering School |
|
Government Technical Institute |
|
American University of Peace Studies Inc. |
|
New Guyana School Inc. |
|
Greenheart Medical University |
|
Lincoln American University Inc. |
|
University of the Southern Caribbean |
|
Guyana Training College for International Skills |
|
Alexander American University |
|
Rajiv Gandhi University of Science and Technology |
|
Universal Emergency Care | Certificate in:
|
QualiTest Training Institute |
|
JTW School of Management & Arts (JTW SMARTS) |
|
Georgetown American University |
|
American International School of Medicine |
|
Computer World Medical Institute |
|
College of Excellence, Management and Business |
Associate of Business (ABA):
Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA)
Bachelor of Laws Bachelor of Laws (LL.B) Master of Business Administration (MBA):
Master of Business Laws (LL.M.) in fourteen specializations:
|
Guyana Learning Institute | Diploma in Psychology
|
Guyana Police Force Academy |
|